LDF proposals

I heard that Groby PC had employed the services of the same lawyer that fought and won in the Klondike case.

If this is true (and I would be grateful if you could confirm), is this laywer working towards presenting a case against all the proposed sites in Groby?

There seem (on initial browsing) to be many good reasons not to have any of the sites when comparing the proposals in the LDF to the requirements listed in the 'Leicester, Leicestershire & Rutland Gypsies' and Travellers' Accommodation Needs Assesment (2006-16)' - from where the site allocation provision for the districts stemmed (I believe).

Thank you in advance for your response.

Sally wrote:I heard that Groby PC had employed the services of the same lawyer that fought and won in the Klondike case.

If this is true (and I would be grateful if you could confirm), is this laywer working towards presenting a case against all the proposed sites in Groby?

I believe it is 'Marrons' Solicitors who fought the Klondike case, and are now handling the legal side of things for all named LDF Groby sites.

I also understand that they have been appointed by other Parish councils i.e. Thornton to represent them too.

Please note the meeting on Monday 9th @ Groby community college

https://grobyactiongroup.forumotion.co.uk/details-of-the-proposals-and-news-f1/special-groby-parish-council-meeting-groby-community-college-monday-9th-march-at-730pm-t92.htm#151